Wikipedia article creation services take a subject from research to a submitted, review-ready article: source gathering, encyclopedic drafting, citation formatting and handling of editor feedback. Wikiagency LTD article packages start at $599 and carry a 100% money-back guarantee if the article is not approved.
Last updated October 2026 by the Wikiagency LTD editorial team.
Editors reviewing a new article ask three questions: is the subject notable, is every claim verifiable and does the text read neutrally. An article that fails any of them is declined or deleted regardless of how much effort went into it.
We approach creation as an editorial project. The structure, lead and referencing follow the conventions of featured and good articles in the same category, so the result looks like it belongs.
What our article creation services include
- Subject research using independent, published sources
- A lead section and body structure modelled on comparable articles
- Inline citations in the correct reference template format
- Internal links to related Wikipedia articles
- Categories and, where suitable, a Wikidata connection
- Submission and reviewer follow-up
How the process works
- Scope. We define what the article covers and which sources support it.
- Write. We draft in neutral prose with a citation per claim.
- Link and format. We add internal links, categories and references.
- Submit. We submit for review and respond to comments.
Who this service is for
- Organisations whose history is covered by news and books
- People with published interviews, profiles or awards
- Products, projects and events with independent coverage
- Teams that want the article reviewed against Wikipedia standards
Policies we follow
Articles are written without copying external text, disclose paid editing and use only images with free licences. We also decline projects that cannot meet notability. Read our guides on how to create a Wikipedia page and how to update Wikipedia pages for the rules in detail.
Timeline and pricing
Basic is $599 in around 5 to 7 weeks, Standard is $999 in 4 to 6 weeks and Premium is $1,199 in 3 to 5 weeks, all one-time fees.
How a Wikipedia article is born
Every Wikipedia article starts as a decision by someone that a subject deserves one. The decision is then tested by the community, either before publication through the draft review process or after publication through new-page patrolling. In both cases the questions are the same: is this subject suitable for an encyclopedia, and does this text meet the standards of one?
Experienced editors can create articles directly in the main space. Newer accounts, and anyone with a conflict of interest, are asked to submit a draft through the Articles for Creation process, where reviewers assess the draft and either accept it or explain what needs to change. We use that route for client work because it brings independent review at the start, which reduces the chance of later deletion.
Article creation as an editorial project
We treat each new article the way a small editorial team would treat a commissioned entry. There is a brief that defines the subject and scope. There is research that gathers the evidence. There is a draft that organises the evidence into readable prose. There is an edit that tightens, checks and improves the draft. And there is a final review that tests the article against policy before it is submitted.
This process may seem heavy for what looks like a short page. But the most common reason for rejection is not a single big error; it is a collection of small ones: an unsupported sentence here, a promotional adjective there, a primary source used where an independent one is needed. A structured process catches them.
Defining scope and title
The first editorial decisions are what the article is about and what it is called. Titles on Wikipedia follow conventions: the most common name, disambiguated where necessary, without titles, slogans or marketing descriptors. A company article uses the company’s common name, with a qualifier if another subject shares it. A person’s article uses the name by which they are best known.
Scope matters too. Whether a founder and a company deserve separate articles, or whether a product line belongs within a company article, depends on independent coverage of each. Splitting a subject into several articles without separate notability invites merge proposals.
Building the lead and the body
The lead section is a self-contained summary. It tells the reader what the subject is, why it matters according to sources and gives the most important facts. It should be understandable without reading the rest. After the lead, the body develops each point in sections, typically in chronological or thematic order.
We write each section from the sources, not from your preferred story. If coverage focuses on a company’s founding and growth, the history section will be longer than the products section. If coverage focuses on awards and research, the structure changes. The balance of the article follows the balance of independent sources.
Technical elements: references, links, categories and templates
A finished article includes more than prose. It has properly formatted references, internal links to related articles, categories that place it in the encyclopedia’s structure and, where appropriate, an infobox and an image. Internal links help readers move between related subjects and signal that the article belongs to a network of knowledge rather than standing alone. We link to relevant pages, taking care not to over-link common words or add promotional links.
We also check disambiguation, redirects from alternative names and the Wikidata item, so that the article is connected to the wider knowledge base.
Submission, review and revision
We submit the draft with a brief note identifying the paid relationship and the nature of the subject. A reviewer may accept it, decline it with comments or leave it in the queue, which can take weeks. If it is declined, we read the comments carefully. A decline often identifies a single issue, such as a section relying on an unreliable source, and fixing it can lead to acceptance on resubmission.
We do not resubmit without making meaningful changes, because repeated unchanged submissions are treated as disruptive.
After publication
Once accepted, the article is moved into the main encyclopedia, where it is subject to ongoing community review. New-page patrollers may add tags or suggestions. Other editors may expand or alter it. We monitor these developments during the aftercare period of your package, respond to questions and improve the article where needed.
If events related to the subject occur, such as an award or acquisition, we advise on whether independent coverage now supports an update.
Costs, timelines and guarantee
Our packages are $599 (Basic), $999 (Standard) and $1,199 (Premium), each a one-time fee, with typical timelines of 5 to 7, 4 to 6 and 3 to 5 weeks respectively. All carry a 100% money-back guarantee if the article is not approved. Because outcomes are decided by volunteer reviewers, timelines are estimates, and we tell you what we expect during the free assessment.
Next steps
If you are considering a new article, start with the free assessment: use the quote form above or book a free consultation. You may also want to read about page creation services, our article notability assessment and article writing services.
Related Wikipedia services
This service works well alongside Wikipedia Page Creation Services, Wikipedia Article Notability Assessment Services, Wikipedia Article Writing Services. You may also find our guides helpful: How to create a Wikipedia page, How to update Wikipedia pages, Who can update Wikipedia pages.