Wikipedia page creation services cover everything needed to publish a new Wikipedia page: a notability check, source research, neutral drafting, submission for review and handling of editor feedback. Wikiagency LTD offers packages from $599 with a 100% money-back guarantee if the page is not approved.
Last updated October 2026 by the Wikiagency LTD editorial team.
A Wikipedia page is not a profile you can simply publish. It is an encyclopedia article that volunteer editors judge against published guidelines, and most self-made drafts are declined because the subject lacks independent coverage or the tone reads like marketing. Page creation services exist to close that gap.
Our team of 100+ people includes 20 Wikipedia administrators and 50 autopatrolled editors, and has contributed over 800,000 edits. That experience shapes how we decide, before any money changes hands, whether your subject can realistically be accepted.
What our page creation services include
- A free notability assessment against Wikipedia’s general and subject-specific guidelines
- Research of independent, reliable sources such as national press, books and trade publications
- A neutral, encyclopedic draft with citations for every contested claim
- Submission through the review process and replies to reviewer comments
- Image guidance covering Wikimedia Commons licensing and copyright
- Monitoring after publication, from 3 to 12 months depending on package
How the process works
- Free assessment. We review your coverage and tell you honestly whether the subject is likely to meet notability.
- Research. We collect independent sources and map each fact to a citation.
- Draft and review. You see the draft before submission. Standard and Premium include revisions.
- Submission and care. We submit, answer editors and then monitor the live page.
Who this service is for
- Founders and executives with press coverage but no page
- Companies that have outgrown a stub or a rejected draft
- Authors, artists, athletes and public figures
- Organisations such as charities, schools and associations
Policies we follow
We disclose paid editing as Wikipedia’s terms of use require, avoid copying text from your website, upload only images you are entitled to license, and never promise a result Wikipedia editors control. Read our guides on how to create a Wikipedia page and how to update Wikipedia pages for the rules in detail.
Timeline and pricing
Basic is $599 and takes around 5 to 7 weeks, Standard is $999 at 4 to 6 weeks, and Premium is $1,199 at 3 to 5 weeks. All are one-time fees with a 100% money-back guarantee if the page is not approved.
Why most new Wikipedia pages are declined
Every day, volunteer reviewers decline a large share of the drafts submitted to Wikipedia. The reasons are remarkably consistent, and almost none of them are about writing quality. They are about evidence. A draft is declined when the subject has not been covered in depth by sources that are independent of it, when the draft leans on the subject’s own website or press releases, or when the language reads as promotional rather than descriptive.
This matters because many organisations approach Wikipedia as a marketing channel. They write a polished company profile, add a logo and a list of achievements, and submit it. Reviewers see this pattern constantly and respond to it quickly. A professional creation service changes the order of work: evidence first, writing second, submission last.
The practical consequence is that a good page creation project often begins with a conversation about what is missing, not about what to write. If your best coverage is a handful of trade-press mentions, the honest advice may be to wait for stronger independent coverage. We would rather tell you that during the free assessment than submit a draft that is certain to fail.
What Wikipedia actually requires of a new page
Three core content policies govern every article. Verifiability means readers must be able to check material against a published source. Neutral point of view means the article represents significant viewpoints fairly and without editorial voice. No original research means you cannot publish new analysis or conclusions that no reliable source has published.
On top of those sits the notability guideline. The general notability guideline asks whether a subject has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. “Significant” means more than a passing mention. “Independent” means the source has no financial or personal stake in the subject. “Reliable” means the source has editorial oversight and a reputation for accuracy.
There are also specialised guidelines. People, companies and organisations, creative works, academics and sportspeople each have their own criteria. A company, for example, is expected to show in-depth coverage rather than routine announcements, funding news or product launches. We match every project to the guideline that will actually be applied.
The page creation process in detail
Stage one: assessment. You send us the subject and the best coverage you are aware of. We run our own searches, grade each source and write a plain-language verdict. This stage is free.Stage two: research. We build a source map. Each fact that will appear on the page is linked to the publication that supports it. Facts without a source are dropped, however true they are, because Wikipedia does not accept statements it cannot verify.Stage three: drafting. Our writers draft in neutral prose, following the layout of comparable accepted pages: a short lead that summarises the subject, then sections such as history, products or work, and recognition. We avoid superlatives, adjectives of praise and mission-statement language.Stage four: review with you. You read the draft for factual accuracy. Your role is to correct mistakes, not to add promotional emphasis. Standard and Premium packages include revision rounds at this stage.Stage five: submission. The page is submitted for review, and we answer reviewer questions. If an editor asks for a stronger source or a rewrite of a paragraph, we act on it promptly.Stage six: aftercare. Once live, we monitor the page for the period included in your package, handle talk-page questions and fix problems before they grow.Sources: the heart of every successful page
Source selection is where most of our time goes. We look for coverage that editors recognise and trust: national and regional newspapers, respected magazines, books from established publishers, academic journals and reputable broadcasters. We also look for independent profiles and interviews, though interviews are treated carefully because they can be regarded as primary material.
We deliberately avoid several categories that clients often assume will help. Press releases and company blogs are not independent. Sponsored articles and advertorials are written to promote. Social media posts and user-generated review sites carry little weight. Directory listings and awards pages that anyone can enter rarely establish notability.
When coverage is borderline, we explain what would strengthen it, for example a feature in a national outlet, a book chapter or independent recognition. We never suggest buying coverage, because paid placements do not count as independent sources and can damage a page if editors discover them.
Disclosure, conflicts of interest and paid editing
Wikipedia’s terms of use require anyone who is paid to edit to disclose their employer, client and affiliation. In addition, the conflict-of-interest guideline strongly encourages people with a close connection to a subject to avoid direct editing and to propose changes through the talk page or the drafts process.
Wikiagency LTD discloses its paid relationship on every project. We follow the proper channels, including submitting new pages for independent review rather than publishing them directly. This protects the client: undisclosed paid editing is one of the fastest ways to see a page deleted and accounts blocked.
If you are considering a provider, ask them how they handle disclosure. Any answer that involves multiple accounts, hidden relationships or “guaranteed” placement should be treated as a warning sign.
What it costs and how long it takes
Our creation packages are one-time fees. Basic ($599) suits individuals and small organisations needing a foundational page, with a typical approval time of 5 to 7 weeks, one image and 3 months of monitoring. Standard ($999) adds in-depth research, up to 2 images, draft review, 6 months of monitoring and page restoration if the page is deleted within 6 months, with a typical timeline of 4 to 6 weeks. Premium ($1,199) adds advanced research with 10 or more reliable sources, up to 3 images, unlimited draft revisions, 12 months of monitoring and maintenance, a senior editor and restoration support within 12 months, typically in 3 to 5 weeks.
Timelines are estimates. Review queues vary, and a reviewer may ask for changes. All three packages carry our 100% money-back guarantee if the page is not approved. If your subject is not notable we say so during the free assessment, before you pay.
Common mistakes we see before clients contact us
- Publishing a page directly from a new account and having it deleted within days.
- Copying text from the company website, which is both promotional and a copyright problem.
- Using only press releases, award listings and social posts as references.
- Writing the page about an individual who is only known as the founder of a company, when the company is the notable subject, or the reverse.
- Uploading a logo or photo taken from the internet without a free licence.
- Repeatedly resubmitting an unchanged draft without addressing the reviewer’s comments.
Each of these is avoidable. Most come from not knowing how the review process works, which is understandable: the rules are detailed and the community is not designed around newcomers.
A pre-submission checklist you can use
Before any page is submitted, we confirm the following. You can use the same list to evaluate any draft.
- The subject has multiple independent sources with significant coverage.
- Every non-obvious statement has an inline citation.
- The lead summarises the subject in neutral terms and does not claim leadership or uniqueness without a source.
- No text has been copied from other websites.
- Images are freely licensed and uploaded to Wikimedia Commons.
- The paid relationship is disclosed.
- Categories and internal links are appropriate.
Why work with Wikiagency LTD
Wikiagency LTD has been creating and maintaining Wikipedia pages since 2014. Our team of more than 100 people includes 20 Wikipedia administrators, 50 autopatrolled editors and over 30 experienced writers, and we have made more than 800,000 edits. We have offices in the United Kingdom, the United States, the United Arab Emirates and Pakistan, so we can work in your time zone.
That experience is useful because it shows us where reviewers hesitate. It also means we recognise when a project should not go ahead, which is part of why we offer a free assessment and a money-back guarantee. If you are ready to explore a page, request a quote above or book a free 30-minute consultation. You can also read our guides on how to create a Wikipedia page and corporate Wikipedia pages.
Page creation for different kinds of subjects
Individuals. Biographies are the most sensitive pages on Wikipedia because of the extra care applied to living people. Every claim about a living person must be carefully sourced, and contentious statements without strong sources are removed immediately. We write biographies conservatively, covering career, notable work and recognition, and avoiding private-life detail that sources do not cover.Companies and organisations. Corporate pages are scrutinised for promotional tone. A good company page records what the organisation is, when it was founded, what it does, how it has developed and how independent sources have described it. It should not read as a brochure. We also pay attention to the corporate structure, because separate pages for subsidiaries or products are usually unnecessary unless each is independently notable.Creative works, events and projects. Books, films, albums, games and events are assessed on reviews and critical commentary. If reviews exist in established outlets, a page is realistic even for a small creative work.Non-profits, schools and associations. These can be notable through press coverage, government records and independent reports. We help you identify which of those sources count.What happens after your page goes live
Publication is not the end of a page’s life. Once visible, a page is open to editing by the whole community. Some edits will improve it, some will correct errors and a few may be unhelpful. Our aftercare monitors the page history, replies to editors on the talk page and fixes citations when links break.
We also help clients understand what to expect: the page belongs to the community, you cannot dictate its content, and good-faith edits by other editors are normal. A page that follows the sources is far more resilient than one that tries to resist change.
When major news occurs, such as an award, merger, product launch or leadership change, it is worth asking whether independent coverage now supports an update. Our updating and monitoring services are designed for exactly this stage.
Related Wikipedia services
This service works well alongside Wikipedia Article Creation Services, Wikipedia Page Notability Assessment Services, Wikipedia Page Writing Services. You may also find our guides helpful: How to create a Wikipedia page, How to update Wikipedia pages, Who can update Wikipedia pages.